The front spoiler I had/have would not fit (made of aluminum) and I had to find something very quick whilst the car was in the painters....nothing else I would have considered was available at the time. I quite like it, but it is something to be changed at a later date (esp. when I get the ally spoiler cut to size). As for the rear, I am not a great fan of no spoiler, as it is there for a reason, and I think the European OEM one a bit out of proportion on the car (too small), hence why my one is not a European spec.Ian your car looks good too but I prefer a smaller front spoiler/valance - just as I think the rears look better without a spoiler (see thumbnail).
As for the rear, I am not a great fan of no spoiler, as it is there for a reason,
As for the rear, I am not a great fan of no spoiler, as it is there for a reason, and I think the European OEM one a bit out of proportion on the car (too small), hence why my one is not a European spec.
On he other hand, if Nissan wanted it to be there 'for a reason', they would have built it into the style - no ?
I've run a Z w/out for 4 years now without any adverse effects.........but mine is lower than average.
A really effective racing version should be larger.
Agreed.I've run a Z w/out for 4 years now without any adverse effects.........but mine is slower than average.
.
From my basic understanding, the S30 design was found to be less stable at 100mph+ by Nissan (e.g. after the S30 was styled),
Happily be corrected on Nissan historical side of things...
And bear in mind this was found on a stock car, not the modern modded S30's we nearly all have today.
We agree to differ then ? Because I beleive that it IS relevant because :Seat of your pants testing is not really relevant, the hard numbers by Nissan are better.
I think that you're wrong.........what IS important is the difference between the airflow over and airflow under the car - THAT is what creates lift !And, whether a car is lower or not has little to do with the downward pressure generated by having a rear spoiler on, its the air flow over the top of the car for this.
We have hi-jacked Zedhead's Thread, suggest this is moved to another section what do you think Zedhead?
Further investigation discovered an issue with the crank damper which appears to have rattled loose from its boss - so I put it back in the garage to be dealt with later.
Clearly the car is still in "shake-down" mode,
Also the engine is running very hot and I need to reconfigure stuff out front so more air gets through the rad - so I don't need a stressful 200 miles round trip worrying about blown
have you found out why she was running hot?
Thanks Steve.
In the short term, just by keeping the water circulating through the heater matrix seems to allieviate the issue. However, I have noticed that if the engine is turned off for a short period, then back on again it is less effective and the temp's creep up (although nothing like as hot).
I think I have a neat solution for the header tank, but not something which is available off the internet. Why on earth would I make my life simple by buying off the shelf parts when I can go through all the grief and expense of customising something