370Z yes or no ?

Mr.F

Mr.F

Inactive
"...like a dog squatting to have a s**t"
Click to expand...

...was in reference to the Crossfire.

re. 370Z - I'm uneasy about the rear end styling and the effect it has on its better angles, e.g front three-quarter. Like the interior refinements. Don't like the loss of the rear cross brace - the iconic jewel under glass.
 
SeanDezart

SeanDezart

Well-Known Forum User
Mr.F said:
...was in reference to the Crossfire.

re. 370Z - I'm uneasy about the rear end styling and the effect it has on its better angles, e.g front three-quarter. Like the interior refinements. Don't like the loss of the rear cross brace - the iconic jewel under glass.
Click to expand...

Alright - I made the reference to the crossfire - you returned with a sarky comment from grey-locks - one could very easily assume.......:p

None of the other Zs before the Z33 had one as standard - stop whinging and start stocking them - you'll sell thousands !:cool:
 
SeanDezart

SeanDezart

Well-Known Forum User
Basically the 370Z looks like it's waiting to pounce, the 240Z looks fast standing still (lowering helps) and it's a great look - I still maintain that the 350Z looks chubby on its' wheels and sits nicely..........but it sits !



At Le Mans !
 
JakTheRuby

JakTheRuby

Club Member
I agree with most of that. But I think like the 350, it (370) needs the nismo kit to achieve that. It gives it the leaning forward dynamacism of a car that's moving whilst standing still. The 240 did this by curvy haunches leading all the way from the back to the point in the middle front. Awesome. I don't think you'd be allowed to make cars like you used to (as a manufacturer) any more because of all of the safety features they have to adhere to now. Everything is chunky now (even Ferraris & Lambo/Audis). It's kind of like the 'renaissance' painters and their curvy ladies. It's the aesthetic of the day. I'm not looking forward to the 'impressionist' period! Oh Lordy...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top