SKiddell said:
what makes you think that it was just a set-up issue at least one car had a credible setup, comparable to an HSCC car
The above statement Steve
!
The HSCC 2.4s did 'show up' (those are harsh wrods of yours originally but let's use them for now - no offence to the likes of you, Rob G, Warby and others) 2.8s on triples etc. How ? I said that the 2.8s etc were at least 5 seconds off the pace - pace recorded on previous HSCC races and qualifying there - NOT on the day of JapFest - can we move on now please
?
Is Warby still playing with Scalextric cars and Toyota brakes ? There is only one brake kit good enough for serious fun on the track, especially for anything over 200bhp and I'd assume that his Scorpio engine (2.9 ?) has at least that !
Another indication of a powerful car not able to fully appreciate (= use) all the power it has available ! A car is a complete package that a circuit drive indicates, one must steer, brake, accelerate etc.
Aniother statement of fact for you
:
Fast cars with poor brakes; fast cars with faulty throttle linkages and fast cars with moderate drivers can all get fast drag-run times (perhaps not THE fastest which also comes with experience) BUT they can't get fast lap times !
Next stop - S30s with the tiniest, lightest of brakes (to comply with the MOT and save weight) and a parachute out the back to slow down after 400m
?
Keep it cool guys - if anyone doesn't take this as fun - say so and we'll stop !
I want my point accepted that the HSCC Zs are not just souped-up road cars with lowered suspension, a roll cage and an extinguisher - they are pukka top level, engineered race cars and are NOT comparable with any of the S30s that were at Jap Fest !