zedhead260 said:
I see it as advertising, it builds revenue for the club to enable it to continue the production of its magazine and all the other expenses brought on by running a club, doing shows etc.
The point is that ANY advertiser will naturally be seen as being in some way *endorsed* by the Club - whether that be true or not, and quite apart from any get-out clauses or smallprint.
To write that
".....The Z Club does not advocate, support or endorse any particular company......." is probably the correct thing to do legally, but does not reflect what actually goes on - does it? If you think that nobody is influenced by what members write on this forum then you are mistaken.
I was also pointing at the plugging that goes on
in thread on this website ( not raising any revenue for your club whatsoever ) which is there for all to see, and once again definitely relays an image of acceptance / endorsement by the Club to the 'outsider' who may view it. Maybe this is somewhat subliminal, but I reckon that the people who see this the most clearly are
not part of the Z Club 'clique'.
Contrast this plugging with the slagging that one Z Club magazine advertiser received on this forum last month. This turned out to be pretty much unwarranted ( a fact admitted by the very people who started it! ) and fairly feeble apologies were given by the instigators, but not even linked to the original thread. I don't see how all of that could be allowed to stay unmoderated but then this latest dispute from 'Chris' be moderated almost immediately. It does not look even-handed to me. The view from 'outside' will surely be to wonder exactly
which Z-related trader Chris had his dispute with, and to be fearful of dealing with all of them, no?
A website like this - intended as part of the Z Club - needs to consider
very carefully what its 'members' are allowed to post.
zedhead260 said:
Adverts are accepted in "Good faith" trade or classified "no liability will be accepted by the Editor or Publishers".
Take a look in the left hand column, page 3 of the latest magazine - it's all there in black and white.
Maybe that is in the club magazine, but I don't see it on this site. Maybe you could point it out to me?
Once again I think this Forum is being mistaken for being a part of the Club when the truth is that the gate is open for all to enter. I can't imagine a situation where a letter from a non-member of the Club would be published in the club magazine without close scrutiny by the Committee or at the very least the magazine editor. Contrast that with what goes on in the Forum.
zedhead260 said:
Oh sorry, you don't have one do you - not being a member an all
I have the great luxury of you making my point for me. Thank you.
No I am not a member of the 'Z Club'. I started looking at this Forum just to see what was being written, and before I thought about it too deeply I found myself posting here too. At no point during that Forum registration 'sign up' process do I remember being asked to join the Z Club as a full member, or being informed that joining the Forum implied an obligation to join the Club. Registration and 'membership' of this kind of Forum is just a couple of mouse clicks away for us all these days. I am a 'member' or registered user of several, and for the most part such a 'membership' or registration is a casual and inconsequential matter.
I suspect that there are probably a few others who subsequently found out that they were "Freeloaders" like myself. Until this Forum is completely locked down as a 'Z Club Members Only' facility I think this will continue to happen.