richiep
Club Member
If you've not already seen the furore building around the Internet about this, then I suggest you see the below. Essentially, an EU Commission proposal, which is close to actually making it onto the books, is planning a Europe-wide harmonization of vehicle testing standards. Sounds sensible on the face of it, considering the lax/non-existent standards in certain areas of the region. However, the devil is in the detail. The proposal includes within it the concept that all modifications, cosmetic or mechanical, from the car's original factory spec are basically illegal, would effectively lead to an MOT failure and require further testing (think Germany/Australia, where mods require engineer approval - at a cost). Reading the technical annexes of the proposal reveals phrases such as "illegal power train modification" - meaning any changes from stock.
The proposal also redefines what an historical vehicle is, which would be exempt from the test regime - a car over 30 years old - but it only classifies if it is bone stock mechanically and in appearance. If modified in any way, it is subject to the testing.
The ACE article arguably adopts the worst case scenario take on things, but we should all be highly vigilant about this, as it could pose a very real danger to the classic and modified car cultures and industry of this country (I can't imagine the aftermarket are very happy about this at all). I can hardly think of any Zeds that do not feature some sort of mod somewhere (non-standard wheels/tyres could be enough to render your car "unroadworthy"). Most classics on the road I would suggest are non-standard. Consequently, we MAY (depending on how it is interpreted practically) be about to suffer a attack of bureaucratic idiocy on our hobby with far reaching consequences.
Armageddon | www.the-ace.org.uk
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0380(01):FIN:EN:PDF
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0380(51):FIN:EN:PDF
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0382(51):FIN:EN:PDF
The proposal also redefines what an historical vehicle is, which would be exempt from the test regime - a car over 30 years old - but it only classifies if it is bone stock mechanically and in appearance. If modified in any way, it is subject to the testing.
The ACE article arguably adopts the worst case scenario take on things, but we should all be highly vigilant about this, as it could pose a very real danger to the classic and modified car cultures and industry of this country (I can't imagine the aftermarket are very happy about this at all). I can hardly think of any Zeds that do not feature some sort of mod somewhere (non-standard wheels/tyres could be enough to render your car "unroadworthy"). Most classics on the road I would suggest are non-standard. Consequently, we MAY (depending on how it is interpreted practically) be about to suffer a attack of bureaucratic idiocy on our hobby with far reaching consequences.
Armageddon | www.the-ace.org.uk
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0380(01):FIN:EN:PDF
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0380(51):FIN:EN:PDF
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0382(51):FIN:EN:PDF