Spike Anderson, Samuri

JK240

Club Member
Ah, Jonathan, school boy error! you should know, post anything on social media and unless you state it’s not to be reproduced without the owners consent it’s fair game!
Could’ve made millions! EXTRA:)
I think you'll find you're wrong there...!

Facebook Terms of Use

Sharing a posted photo on a social network using a share button is actually fine because you are crediting the owner of the photo. Downloading a photo to your computer and using the image without written permission, is not allowed.


Ask Anderson/Lee if they need my address for the cheque...?

Cheers,

JK
 

SeanDezart

Well-Known Forum User
I think you'll find you're wrong there...!

Facebook Terms of Use

Sharing a posted photo on a social network using a share button is actually fine because you are crediting the owner of the photo. Downloading a photo to your computer and using the image without written permission, is not allowed.


Ask Anderson/Lee if they need my address for the cheque...?

Cheers,

JK

Ooh, rubbery cheques - I rub-em !

Didn't I hear a rumour that Rahail now owns the rights to Samuri ? No.82+ OMG !
 

Al Douglas

Club Member
I think you'll find you're wrong there...!

Facebook Terms of Use

Sharing a posted photo on a social network using a share button is actually fine because you are crediting the owner of the photo. Downloading a photo to your computer and using the image without written permission, is not allowed.


Ask Anderson/Lee if they need my address for the cheque...?

Cheers,

JK
I was joking Johnathan!! :banghead:
 
New cover picture

XAJmD3Z.jpg
 

Al Douglas

Club Member
What 'time' was that?
Hi Rob, teatime!?
Dunno, 70’s 80’s 90’ I guess. Other than the last three which were done for various reasons , no I’m not naive enough not to know some of those reasons were financial (but then why not, his creation, his marque, his effort, his financial input and risk in the early days, his development, his trademark, his baby!)
I just get that he thinks it’s time to close the book or however you want to put it. Samuri was mainly him and it’s over. Leave it where it is. Let others do what they want but let them do it their way I think is the point of his “update”.
Al.
 

STEVE BURNS

Club Member
Personally think Spike would do his reputation a power of good if he deleted that outburst and returned to the guy who was friendly helpful and the guy who most remembered that way
Rather than coming over as a bitter vindictive guy who could be remembered for all the wrong reasons
 

Rob Gaskin

Treasurer
Staff member
Site Administrator
Hi Rob, teatime!?
Dunno, 70’s 80’s 90’ I guess. Other than the last three which were done for various reasons , no I’m not naive enough not to know some of those reasons were financial (but then why not, his creation, his marque, his effort, his financial input and risk in the early days, his development, his trademark, his baby!)
I just get that he thinks it’s time to close the book or however you want to put it. Samuri was mainly him and it’s over. Leave it where it is. Let others do what they want but let them do it their way I think is the point of his “update”.
Al.


The Samuri 'Time' was the 70s. The 'book' should have been closed after that.
 
Last edited:
Top