I've got garage envy!
Hah hah, thanks Rob, it’s a mess right now buts it’s my favourite space!I've got garage envy!
I've got garage envy!
You’ve got more clear floor space than I have! Too many parts lying around my garage! At least I have a second space to work in too (the barn/workshop)!
Nice work on verifying. So quite close (closer than I remember). I guess the point I am making is that to really take advantage of the LD you need to maximise what it’s capable of and the other parts of the stroker setup with it. Otherwise you aren’t really adding much over what you can achieve with an L28 crank in a well built engine. That 6-800 quid for an LD crank could easily go towards other aspects in making an L28-L30 size engine that could outperform a more modest 3.1. But it depends on what you want to achieve. After all, my whole concept of stroker building - as we’ve talked about before - has got skewed by mission creep and BHP chasing!
I don’t know the maths, but I’m sure there must be some discussion (hybridz?) on the difference in rotating mass of the two cranks. Some of the Japanese modified LD cranks I’ve seen are almost unrecognisable based on the reshaping of the counterweights. That 400g probably equates to a big difference when pushing 9k revs...
Ah yeah, I remember we discussed that. I’ll be interested in seeing that come to fruition. It’s on my list of things I’d like to try out. It’s a route to 3.2L and up.Can’t remember if I’ve already said elesewhere, but I’m hoping to maximise on the crank by offset grinding another couple of mm and rebuilding on Toyota rods. Still hopefully a fairly cheap option as the LD engine was cheap enough, but the money will evaporate elsewhere I’m sure!!
The thing that puts me off about big bore engines is having too much mid-range torque/power.